A contentious proposal to introduce an all-island leisure rate to fund regional swimming pools and the NSC was defeated in the Tynwald amid a passionate debate over fairness, local governance, and long-overdue rate reform.
The motion, brought by Ramsey MHK Lawrie Hooper, sought to replace the current “piecemeal” system, where only residents in the north, south, and west pay a local authority swimming pool rate, with a universal levy.
Currently, the NSC in Douglas is funded solely by the Department of Education, Sport and Culture (DESC), while the other three pools rely on a mix of local rates and DESC subventions.
Mr Hooper argued the status quo is unjust: “Everybody on the island contributes towards the NSC, and everybody in the north, west, and south also pay a second time towards their regional pool.
“There is no logical reason why people in the east should be treated differently.”
He proposed two solutions: abolish regional rates (risking education budget cuts) or apply the same rate island-wide. The latter, he said, would create a “level playing field” and ease pressure on DESC funding.
A “Flawed” Fix
Treasury Minister Dr. Alex Allinson opposed the motion, calling it a “tax on Douglas ratepayers to fund the NSC” and a stopgap measure that fails to address systemic issues.
He cited a 2015 consultation where 49% supported an all-island rate but warned: “Just papering over the cracks of a fundamentally flawed and unfair rate system will not gain my support.”
Chris Thomas echoed concerns about governance, questioning whether eastern commissioners should control the NSC: “The idea that the National Sports Centre is controlled in part by a non-district commissioner is a quite surprising thought.”
East vs. Rest
The debate exposed stark regional tensions.
Julie Edge, MHK for Onchan, noted eastern ratepayers already fund amenities like Onchan Park, used island-wide: “We welcome everybody from across our island.
She added: “But do any of you pay towards it? No, not one in here, unless you live in Onchan.”
Douglas North MHK David Ashford rejected the motion outright, opposing any all-island rate: “I’ve spent my entire political career opposed to an all-island leisure rate.”
He added that it centralises too much power away from local authorities.
Despite opposition it was supported by, amongst others, Jason Moorhouse, who said the current system is simply not fair.
The motion failed 4-19 in the Keys but was supported 5–3 in the Legislative Council, as a result the motion was lost.
7 Comments